Vercel Security Review brings AI security review into Vercel, checking the code in each push to a connected GitHub repository. For teams already on Vercel Pro, it is an easy way to catch issues as they land. Some teams, though, want an audit of the whole application, testing of the running app, or a tool that works outside one platform. If you are weighing your options, these are the five Vercel Security Review alternatives worth a close look:
- AISafe Labs
- Claude Security
- Codex Security
- Aikido
- GitHub Code Security (CodeQL)
This comparison was published on November 11, 2026 and reflects the tools as we tested them then. Pricing and features change often, so check each vendor’s current pages for the latest.
What is Vercel Security Review?
Vercel Security Review is a feature of Vercel Agent that reviews the code changed in each push to a connected GitHub repository. The first review covers the full source, and later reviews look at what each push changes. It flags vulnerabilities and credential exposure, describes how each issue could be exploited, and reports findings to the Vercel dashboard, GitHub checks, pull request comments, the CLI and the audit log. Vercel Agent can then open a pull request with a fix.
Security Review is in public beta and available on the Pro and Enterprise plans. Reviews were free until 10 November 2026. They are now billed by the model tokens each review uses, at the provider's cost plus $0.25 per million tokens, on top of Pro seats at $20 per developer a month.
Why organizations look for Vercel Security Review alternatives
Vercel Security Review is a convenient reviewer for teams that already build on Vercel, but teams usually start looking elsewhere for one of three reasons.
1. It reviews changes, one push at a time. After the first review, Security Review looks at the code each push changes. Flaws that span several features, such as an access-control gap between two parts of the application or a race condition around a business limit, can be hard to see in a single diff. Teams that want a full audit of the codebase whenever they need one may want another tool.
2. It does not test the running application. Security Review analyses source code. It does not run penetration tests or monitor live applications, and it describes how a vulnerability could be exploited without providing a working exploit. Teams that want findings proven against their deployed application have to add a separate tool.
3. It is tied to Vercel's plans and workflow. Security Review needs a Vercel Pro or Enterprise plan and runs only on Vercel. Findings stay in the Vercel dashboard, GitHub and the CLI, with no Jira or Linear sync. Since 10 November 2026 each review is billed by the tokens it uses, and Vercel does not publish what a review of a full codebase costs, which makes spend harder to predict.
Top 5 Vercel Security Review alternatives
Here is how the leading alternatives compare, starting with the one we build.
#1 AISafe Labs
AISafe Labs is an application security platform that uses AI agents to test your code and your running application the way an attacker would. It runs code audits, black-box and white-box pentests, pull request reviews and continuous monitoring from one place, and its free plan includes a full SAST suite.
Where Vercel Security Review looks at the code changed in each push, an AISafe Labs Code Audit covers the whole codebase at once. Its agents build a model of your codebase and trace user input from where it enters to where it reaches a sensitive operation, so they can find flaws that depend on how several features work together, such as broken access control between teams and business-logic errors. A separate triage pass then confirms each finding, merges duplicates that share a root cause and shows its reasoning. Our AISafe Labs vs Vercel Security Review comparison runs both on the same codebase, if you want to see them side by side.
Key features
- Code Audit: AI agents review the whole repository and report evidence-backed findings with exact code locations, the path user input takes, and remediation guidance.
- Code Scan, free: SAST, AI SAST, dependency scanning, secrets detection, licence risk and IaC scanning on the free Basic plan, with no card required.
- Black-box and white-box pentests: agents probe your live application over HTTP and in a browser, and white-box tests combine source access with live confirmation, so findings come with evidence you can replay.
- Pull request security review: every pull request is reviewed for security defects, using what earlier audits learned about the project.
- Endpoint monitoring: AISafe re-runs the proof of each fixed finding against your live application on a schedule and alerts you when a fix regresses.
- Fix verification (beta): check a patched source revision against the original finding before you deploy it.
- Built for coding agents: findings, remediation guidance and fix verification are available through the AISafe API, so your own coding agent can read a finding, write the patch and start the verification itself.
- Fits your workflow: export findings to Jira or Linear, get alerts in Slack or Teams, and run AISafe on your own infrastructure if you need to.
Why AISafe Labs stands out as a Vercel Security Review alternative
- It audits the whole application. A Code Audit reads the entire codebase, so flaws that cross several features, such as two-factor and re-authentication weaknesses, missing rate limits and race conditions around business limits, are in scope from the start.
- It proves findings on the live application. Pentests confirm issues against your running application with a working proof of concept, so your team spends its time fixing instead of triaging.
- It fits any stack and workflow. Findings go to Jira or Linear, alerts go to Slack or Teams, and you can run AISafe on your own infrastructure, wherever your application is deployed.
Pricing
The Basic plan is free and includes the full SAST suite. Pro starts at $40 a month and includes the same number of credits, which pay for code audits, pentests and continuous work; the price of a code audit depends on the size of the codebase and is shown before you start.
Ideal for: Teams that want more than a scanner: engineering and security teams that need to find logic and access-control flaws, test the running application, and close the loop from finding to verified fix, without moving to an enterprise contract.
#2 Claude Security
Claude Security is Anthropic's set of code security tools. The /security-review command in Claude Code runs a single pass over a branch, a Claude Security plugin runs a multi-agent scan of a codebase or diff and writes reviewed patches, and a hosted service in Enterprise beta rescans connected repositories as code changes.
Key features
- Multi-agent scan of a whole repository or a pull request diff
- Findings checked by independent verifier agents
- Reviewed patches, and Claude can open a pull request
- The plugin runs locally, while the models stay hosted
- Hosted rescans of connected repositories, in Enterprise beta
- Webhooks and an API for findings, in Enterprise beta
Ideal for: Teams already using Claude Code that want a whole-repository AI review with patches, and are comfortable paying for scans as model usage on a paid Claude plan.
#3 Codex Security
Codex Security is OpenAI's code security agent. It scans connected GitHub repositories in Codex and monitors new commits, and its plugin, open-source CLI and SDK scan code locally or in CI and propose patches.
Key features
- Hosted scans of connected GitHub repositories
- Open-source CLI and SDK that run locally or in CI
- A proof of concept or reproducer when practical, and custom validation that can test a running app
- Suggested patches or draft pull requests
- Export findings to Jira, Linear and GitHub Issues
- Pull request security reviews on Pro, Business, Edu and Enterprise
Ideal for: Teams on ChatGPT Business or Enterprise that want AI code scanning they can also run on their own machines or in CI. Eligible accounts get $500 in free scanning credits to try it.
#4 Aikido
Aikido is an all-in-one application security platform that covers code, dependencies, cloud and runtime from one dashboard. It adds AI Code Analysis, where agents audit selected repositories for security issues, and AI pentests, both billed in credits at $1 each.
Key features
- SAST, dependency, secrets and IaC scanning, with AI SAST on the free plan
- AI Code Analysis of selected repositories, paid in credits
- AI pentests, including whitebox testing, per assessment or on each deploy
- AutoFix pull requests, with 10 a month on the free plan
- Deep Review of pull requests from the Basic plan
- Jira and Linear sync from the Basic plan
Ideal for: Teams that want one vendor for code, cloud and runtime security, with AI audits and pentests available on demand.
#5 GitHub Code Security (CodeQL)
GitHub Code Security bundles CodeQL, GitHub's semantic code analysis engine, with Copilot Autofix and an AI scan of pull requests. Secret scanning is sold separately as Secret Protection, and Dependabot alerts are available on every repository.
Key features
- CodeQL dataflow analysis, with queries you can extend
- Copilot Autofix suggestions on alerts
- AI scan of pull requests, generally available since October 2026
- AI scan of whole repositories, in public preview
- Free for public repositories
- Self-hosting through GitHub Enterprise Server
Ideal for: Teams already on GitHub that want code scanning built into pull requests, especially open-source projects, which get it for free.
How to choose the right Vercel Security Review alternative for you
The right choice depends on what you need your security tooling to catch and how your team works. When you compare options, check:
- Whether you need the whole codebase or each change. Reviewing diffs catches issues as they land. A full audit finds flaws that span several features. Decide which you need, or whether you need both.
- Whether you need to test the running application. Static analysis and live testing find different problems. Decide whether you need pentests, and which plan includes them.
- How findings are proven. Ask whether each finding comes with a written attack path, a reproducer or a working proof of concept against your application.
- Where findings and fixes go. Check whether the tool works with your issue tracker and chat tools, whether it can run on your own infrastructure, and whether it writes and verifies fixes.
- What it costs as you grow. Compare billing models: per seat, per committer, per token or per credit, and whether the vendor tells you the cost of a full scan before you run it.
Make the switch from Vercel Security Review to AISafe Labs
Vercel Security Review is a convenient way to review changes inside the Vercel workflow. As your application grows, AISafe Labs helps you go further: AI agents that audit the whole codebase for logic and access-control flaws, pentests that prove them on your live application, and fix verification that closes the loop.
You can start on the free Basic plan, which includes the full SAST suite, and run your first code audit in minutes. Start for free or see the full AISafe Labs vs Vercel Security Review comparison.
