Claude Security brings Anthropic's models to code security, and for teams that already use Claude it is an easy way to review code for vulnerabilities. Some teams find they also need to test the running application, scan dependencies, or know what a scan will cost before it runs. If you are weighing your options, these are the five Claude Security alternatives worth a close look:
- AISafe Labs
- Codex Security
- Aikido
- Vercel Security Review
- GitHub Code Security (CodeQL)
This comparison was published on November 11, 2026 and reflects the tools as we tested them then. Pricing and features change often, so check each vendor’s current pages for the latest.
What is Claude Security?
Claude Security is Anthropic's set of code security tools. It comes in three forms. The /security-review command in Claude Code makes a single pass over the changes on a branch. The Claude Security plugin runs a multi-agent scan of a whole codebase or a diff, has independent verifier agents check each finding, and writes reviewed patches; Claude can then open a pull request. A hosted service, in beta for Claude Enterprise, rescans connected repositories as the code changes and can send findings out through webhooks and an API.
The command and the plugin run on any paid Claude plan or on Anthropic API usage, and scans count as normal usage. On Claude Team, a team of 10 pays $250 a month in seats. The hosted service needs an Enterprise premium seat and is billed at token cost, with no platform fee.
Why organizations look for Claude Security alternatives
Claude Security reviews code well, but teams usually start looking elsewhere for one of three reasons.
1. It reads source code and does not test the running application. Claude Security works on your repository. It does not run black-box or white-box pentests, and the hosted service rescans repositories rather than live targets. Its findings describe the attack path in writing, without a runnable exploit, so your team still has to confirm each one against the deployed application.
2. It is one part of a security programme. Anthropic's documentation tells you to keep your dependency scanners, because Claude Security does not look for known vulnerabilities in third-party packages. Teams that want code review, dependency scanning and live testing in one place need to add other tools alongside it.
3. Costs are hard to predict, and continuous scanning is Enterprise only. There is no free plan, and Anthropic does not publish what a full scan costs: it depends on the tokens the scan uses. The hosted service that rescans repositories as code changes is in beta for Enterprise customers with premium seats, so teams on smaller plans run scans themselves.
Top 5 Claude Security alternatives
Here is how the leading alternatives compare, starting with the one we build.
#1 AISafe Labs
AISafe Labs is an application security platform that uses AI agents to test your code and your running application the way an attacker would. It runs code audits, black-box and white-box pentests, pull request reviews and continuous monitoring from one place, and its free plan includes a full SAST suite.
Where Claude Security reviews your source code, AISafe Labs also attacks the running application to prove what it finds. Its agents build a model of your codebase and trace user input from where it enters to where it reaches a sensitive operation, which lets them find flaws that depend on how your application is meant to behave, such as broken access control between teams and business-logic errors. A separate triage pass then confirms each finding, merges duplicates that share a root cause and shows its reasoning. Our AISafe Labs vs Claude Security comparison runs both on the same codebase, if you want to see them side by side.
Key features
- Code Audit: AI agents review the whole repository and report evidence-backed findings with exact code locations, the path user input takes, and remediation guidance.
- Code Scan, free: SAST, AI SAST, dependency scanning, secrets detection, licence risk and IaC scanning on the free Basic plan, with no card required.
- Black-box and white-box pentests: agents probe your live application over HTTP and in a browser, and white-box tests combine source access with live confirmation, so findings come with evidence you can replay.
- Pull request security review: every pull request is reviewed for security defects, using what earlier audits learned about the project.
- Endpoint monitoring: AISafe re-runs the proof of each fixed finding against your live application on a schedule and alerts you when a fix regresses.
- Fix verification (beta): check a patched source revision against the original finding before you deploy it.
- Built for coding agents: findings, remediation guidance and fix verification are available through the AISafe API, so your own coding agent can read a finding, write the patch and start the verification itself.
- Fits your workflow: export findings to Jira or Linear, get alerts in Slack or Teams, and run AISafe on your own infrastructure if you need to.
Why AISafe Labs stands out as a Claude Security alternative
- It proves findings on the live application. Pentests confirm issues against your running application with evidence you can replay, so your team spends its time fixing instead of triaging.
- It keeps watching after the fix. Endpoint monitoring re-runs the proof of each fixed finding against your live application, so you hear about a regression from AISafe instead of from an attacker.
- It covers more of the stack in one place. Dependency, secrets, licence and IaC scanning sit next to the code audit, and they are free on the Basic plan.
- You see the price before you start. A code audit is priced by the size of the codebase and the cost is shown before it runs.
Pricing
The Basic plan is free and includes the full SAST suite. Pro starts at $40 a month and includes the same number of credits, which pay for code audits, pentests and continuous work; the price of a code audit depends on the size of the codebase and is shown before you start.
Ideal for: Teams that want more than a code reviewer: engineering and security teams that need to find logic and access-control flaws, test the running application, and close the loop from finding to verified fix, without moving to an enterprise contract.
#2 Codex Security
Codex Security is OpenAI's code security agent. It scans connected GitHub repositories in Codex, and a plugin, an open-source CLI and an SDK scan code locally or in CI and propose patches.
It is the closest match to Claude Security in how it works, and it adds integrations that teams often ask for, such as exporting findings to issue trackers. Scans are billed by token usage, and eligible accounts get $500 in free scanning credits.
Key features
- Scans of whole repositories, with a suggested patch or a draft pull request
- Pull request security reviews on Pro, Business, Edu and Enterprise plans
- A proof of concept or reproducer when practical, and custom validation that can test a running app
- Export to Jira, Linear and GitHub Issues
- Open-source CLI and SDK that run locally or in CI
Ideal for: Teams that already use ChatGPT and Codex and want an AI security agent they can run in their own CI.
#3 Aikido
Aikido is an all-in-one application security platform that covers code, dependencies, cloud and runtime from one dashboard. It adds AI Code Analysis, where agents audit selected repositories, and AI pentests, both billed in credits.
Key features
- AI SAST, dependency, secrets and IaC scanning, with AI SAST on the free plan
- AutoFix pull requests, with 10 a month on the free plan
- Cloud posture management for AWS, GCP and Azure
- Zen, an in-app firewall that blocks attacks at runtime
- AI Code Analysis and AI pentests, paid in credits at $1 each
- Jira and Linear sync from the Basic plan
Ideal for: Teams that want one vendor for code, cloud and runtime security, with published plan prices for each block of 10 users.
#4 Vercel Security Review
Vercel Security Review is a Vercel Agent feature that reviews the code changed in each push to a connected GitHub repository. It reports vulnerabilities to a dashboard, GitHub checks and pull request comments, and Vercel Agent can then open a pull request with a fix. It was in public beta when we last checked.
Key features
- A review of every push, with comments on private pull requests
- A review of the full source the first time a repository is connected
- Flags credential exposure in changes
- Fix pull requests opened by Vercel Agent
- Billed by the tokens each review uses, on Pro or Enterprise
Ideal for: Teams that deploy on Vercel and want security review inside the workflow they already use.
#5 GitHub Code Security (CodeQL)
GitHub Code Security bundles CodeQL, GitHub's semantic code analysis engine, with Copilot Autofix and an AI scan of pull requests. Secret scanning is sold separately as Secret Protection, and Dependabot alerts are available on every repository.
Key features
- CodeQL dataflow analysis, with queries you can extend
- Copilot Autofix suggestions on alerts
- AI scan of pull requests, generally available since October 2026, and of whole repositories in public preview
- Free for public repositories
- Self-hosting through GitHub Enterprise Server
Ideal for: Teams already on GitHub that want code scanning built into pull requests, especially open-source projects, which get it for free.
How to choose the right Claude Security alternative for you
The right choice depends on what you need your security tooling to catch and how your team works. When you compare options, check:
- Which vulnerabilities matter most. If access control, authentication and business logic are your biggest risks, look for a tool that reasons about your application and confirms what it finds.
- Whether you need to test the running application. Code review and live testing find different problems. Decide whether you need pentests, and which plan includes them.
- How much of the stack it covers. Check whether dependency, secrets and IaC scanning are included or need separate tools.
- How fixes get done. Look at whether the tool writes patches, guides your own coding agent, and verifies that a fix works.
- What it costs as you grow. Compare billing models: per seat, per committer, per token or per credit, whether you can see the cost of a scan before it runs, and which features need an enterprise contract.
Make the switch from Claude Security to AISafe Labs
Claude Security is a convenient way to review code if your team already uses Claude. AISafe Labs helps you go further: AI agents that find the logic and access-control flaws in your code, pentests that prove them on your live application, and fix verification that closes the loop.
You can start on the free Basic plan, which includes the full SAST suite, and run your first code audit in minutes. Start for free or see the full AISafe Labs vs Claude Security comparison.
