Top 5 Veria Labs alternatives

Top 5 Veria Labs alternatives

Five Veria Labs alternatives for AI code security, with what each one does best and who it suits.

Fineas Silaghi
Fineas Silaghi

Veria Labs is a young, Y Combinator-backed AI security company, and teams like that it reviews every pull request and opens the patch itself. Its prices are not published, though, and some teams want their running application tested as well as their code. If you are weighing your options, these are the five Veria Labs alternatives worth a close look:

  1. AISafe Labs
  2. Hacktron
  3. Codex Security
  4. Claude Security
  5. Aikido
Note

This comparison was published on November 13, 2026 and reflects the tools as we tested them then. Pricing and features change often, so check each vendor’s current pages for the latest.


What is Veria Labs?

Veria Labs describes its product, Veria, as an autonomous pentester that maps your attack surface, proves real exploits and drafts the fix. It reviews every pull request as it opens and comments on the vulnerable line with a fix, and its findings point to the exact file and lines in your code.

Veria also matches your dependencies against known advisories and checks whether your code calls the vulnerable part, marking each one reachable or unreachable. It writes patches and opens them as pull requests, posts new findings to Slack and turns them into Linear issues. Veria Labs is backed by Y Combinator, announced a $3.2 million seed round in 2026, and sells through demo bookings.


Why organizations look for Veria Labs alternatives

Veria Labs does a lot well, but teams usually start looking elsewhere for one of three reasons.

1. Prices are not published. Veria Labs' website has no pricing page and no free plan or trial; access starts with booking a demo. That makes it hard to compare costs or to try the product on a small project first.

2. It works from code and pull requests. Veria describes reviewing code and pull requests, but it does not describe testing a running web application or API, scheduled testing, or monitoring of a live target. Teams that want proof against their deployed application need a second tool.

3. Integrations and coverage are narrow so far. Findings go to Slack and Linear, with no Jira integration mentioned, and the site does not describe SAST, secrets or IaC scanning, self-hosting or security certifications. It also has no public documentation to check these details against.


Top 5 Veria Labs alternatives

Here is how the leading alternatives compare, starting with the one we build.

#1 AISafe Labs

AISafe Labs is an application security platform that uses AI agents to test your code and your running application the way an attacker would. It runs code audits, black-box and white-box pentests, pull request reviews and continuous monitoring from one place, and its free plan includes a full SAST suite.

Like Veria, AISafe Labs uses AI agents that read your code and review your pull requests. The difference is that it also tests your running application. Its agents build a model of your codebase and trace user input from where it enters to where it reaches a sensitive operation, and black-box and white-box pentests confirm issues against your live application. A separate triage pass then confirms each finding, merges duplicates that share a root cause and shows its reasoning.

Key features

  • Code Audit: AI agents review the whole repository and report evidence-backed findings with exact code locations, the path user input takes, and remediation guidance.
  • Code Scan, free: SAST, AI SAST, dependency scanning, secrets detection, licence risk and IaC scanning on the free Basic plan, with no card required.
  • Black-box and white-box pentests: agents probe your live application over HTTP and in a browser, and white-box tests combine source access with live confirmation, so findings come with evidence you can replay.
  • Pull request security review: every pull request is reviewed for security defects, using what earlier audits learned about the project.
  • Endpoint monitoring: AISafe re-runs the proof of each fixed finding against your live application on a schedule and alerts you when a fix regresses.
  • Fix verification (beta): check a patched source revision against the original finding before you deploy it.
  • Built for coding agents: findings, remediation guidance and fix verification are available through the AISafe API, so your own coding agent can read a finding, write the patch and start the verification itself.
  • Fits your workflow: export findings to Jira or Linear, get alerts in Slack or Teams, and run AISafe on your own infrastructure if you need to.

Why AISafe Labs stands out as a Veria Labs alternative

  • Its prices are published. The Basic plan is free with no card required, Pro starts at $40 a month, and the price of a code audit is shown before it starts, so you can try it on your own code without a demo.
  • It proves issues on your live application. Black-box and white-box pentests confirm findings against your running application, with evidence you can replay, and endpoint monitoring re-tests fixed findings on a schedule.
  • It covers the basics for free. The Basic plan includes SAST, AI SAST, dependency scanning, secrets detection, licence risk and IaC scanning.
  • It fits more of your workflow. Findings export to Jira or Linear, alerts go to Slack or Teams, and AISafe can run on your own infrastructure.

Pricing

The Basic plan is free and includes the full SAST suite. Pro starts at $40 a month and includes the same number of credits, which pay for code audits, pentests and continuous work; the price of a code audit depends on the size of the codebase and is shown before you start.

Ideal for: Teams that want more than a pentest: engineering and security teams that need to find logic and access-control flaws in code and in the running application, and close the loop from finding to verified fix, without moving to an enterprise contract.

#2 Hacktron

Hacktron is an AI security platform with three products. Review checks each pull request for exploitable vulnerabilities, Whitebox runs AI pentests from source code with optional testing of the deployed application, and Red is continuous red teaming of a whole organisation. Researchers validate Whitebox and Red findings.

Key features

  • Pull request review from $40 per developer a month, free for qualifying open-source repositories
  • Whitebox pentests priced by lines of code, about $500 per 100,000 lines, with one free retest
  • Proof for each Whitebox and Red finding
  • Tested fix pull requests, paid in automation credits
  • Two-way Jira and Linear sync
  • An on-premises edition on the Enterprise plan

Ideal for: Teams that want AI pentests of their code with findings validated by researchers, and are comfortable paying per pentest by codebase size.

#3 Codex Security

Codex Security is OpenAI's code security agent. It scans connected GitHub repositories in Codex, and a plugin, an open-source CLI and an SDK scan code locally or in CI and propose patches.

It is the closest match to Claude Security in how it works, and it adds integrations that teams often ask for, such as exporting findings to issue trackers. Scans are billed by token usage, and eligible accounts get $500 in free scanning credits.

Key features

  • Scans of whole repositories, with a suggested patch or a draft pull request
  • Pull request security reviews on Pro, Business, Edu and Enterprise plans
  • A proof of concept or reproducer when practical, and custom validation that can test a running app
  • Export to Jira, Linear and GitHub Issues
  • Open-source CLI and SDK that run locally or in CI

Ideal for: Teams that already use ChatGPT and Codex and want an AI security agent they can run in their own CI.

#4 Claude Security

Claude Security is Anthropic's set of code security tools. The /security-review command in Claude Code makes a single pass over a branch, and the Claude Security plugin runs a multi-agent scan of a whole codebase or a diff and writes reviewed patches. A hosted service, in beta for Claude Enterprise, rescans connected repositories as code changes.

Key features

  • Multi-agent scans of a whole repository, with findings checked by independent verifier agents
  • Reviewed patches, and Claude can open a pull request with the fix
  • On-demand scans of a pull request diff through the plugin
  • A written attack path for each finding
  • The plugin runs locally, while the models stay hosted
  • Webhooks and an API for findings in the Enterprise beta

Ideal for: Teams that already pay for Claude and want a whole-repository security review inside that subscription. Anthropic's docs suggest keeping your dependency scanners alongside it.

#5 Aikido

Aikido is an all-in-one application security platform that covers code, dependencies, cloud and runtime from one dashboard. It adds AI Code Analysis, where agents audit selected repositories, and AI pentests, both billed in credits.

Key features

  • AI SAST, dependency, secrets and IaC scanning, with AI SAST on the free plan
  • AutoFix pull requests, with 10 a month on the free plan
  • Cloud posture management for AWS, GCP and Azure
  • Zen, an in-app firewall that blocks attacks at runtime
  • AI Code Analysis and AI pentests, paid in credits at $1 each
  • Jira and Linear sync from the Basic plan

Ideal for: Teams that want one vendor for code, cloud and runtime security, with published plan prices for each block of 10 users.


How to choose the right Veria Labs alternative for you

The right choice depends on what you need your security tooling to catch and how your team works. When you compare options, check:

  • Which vulnerabilities matter most. If access control, authentication and business logic are your biggest risks, look for a tool that reasons about your application rather than one that only matches patterns.
  • Whether you need to test the running application. Code review and live testing find different problems. Decide whether you need pentests, and which plan includes them.
  • How much noise you can absorb. Ask each vendor how findings are validated, and run a trial on your own code to see how many are real.
  • How fixes get done. Look at whether the tool writes patches, guides your own coding agent, and verifies that a fix works.
  • What it costs as you grow. Compare billing models, per developer, per scan, per token or per credit, and whether prices are published or only available from sales.

Make the switch from Veria Labs to AISafe Labs

Veria Labs is a promising choice for teams that want AI review of every pull request with patches opened for them. If you also want your running application tested, findings verified against it, and a published price, AISafe Labs covers that in one platform.

You can start on the free Basic plan, which includes the full SAST suite, and run your first code audit in minutes. Start for free.

Subscribe to our newsletter.